Insights from this study may inform writing pedagogy and professional development in further disciplines where theory requires integration into practice. This presentation reports on an interdisciplinary collaboration between applied linguists and an organizational behavior OB professor to scaffold analytical argumentative writing using the tools of systemic functional linguistics SFL and Legitimation Code Theory LCT. While SFL research has provided rich descriptions of features of disciplinary genres with an explicit focus on language e.
Students need to know not only the ways that language is used in disciplines to create meaning, but also the ways that knowledge and knowing are legitimated within disciplines.
- The Inside Text: Social, Cultural and Design Perspectives on SMS!
- Performance and Motivation Strategies for Todays Workforce: A Guide to Expectancy Theory Applications?
- The Inside Text Social Cultural And Design Perspectives On Sms;
- The Inside Text: Social, Cultural and Design Perspectives on SMS (English) Paper;
- Silicone Elastomers 2011.
- The Inside Text.
- Military Power, Conflict and Trade: Military Power, International Commerce and Great Power Rivalry!
LCT was developed as a way to understand the ways in which knowledge is built by knowers in fields of practice Maton, Recent collaborations between SFL and LCT have shown ways that concepts from both theories can complement each other in informing pedagogical practice e. The case proposal genre involves the analysis of a case e. I illustrate student struggles and successes highlighting writing development across drafts and differences between high-graded and low-graded writing. The role of feedback for student writers is one of the crucial factors in the development of their academic writing skill.
- Stars and Strife: The Coming Conflicts between the USA and the European Union!
- Summers Storm.
- The Inside Text: Social, Cultural and Design Perspectives on SMS (English) Paper!
We should note that when the students who study English as a foreign language EFL in a non-native country are considered, their struggle has doubled as they try to acquire a new discourse besides coping with learning another language. This process also requires a shift across different rhetorical styles. Thus, the character of feedback bears even more importance for that group of student writers. Both qualitative and quantitative data were collected and more will be collated using face-to-face interviews, online surveys and think-aloud method to triangulate findings.
On the other hand, some students feel insecure about what to revise when the teacher uses questions for further clarification in her written feedback. These indicate that the study promises even more interesting results consisting various emotional reactions of students. Central to learning in writing groups is the possibility for low-stakes discussion of writing among peers Aitchison, So far, there is little research that observes how participants actually negotiate their peer feedback.
Drawing on interactional sociolinguistics, the present study applies the concept of interactionally established discourse roles cf.
Who’s Afraid of the Audience? – Digital and Post-Digital Perspectives on Aesthetics
We ask: How do participants negotiate their roles and identities in writing group interactions? How is feedback constructed in these groups? The recordings cover a period of eight weeks and are complemented by follow-up interviews.
Approaching the texts from these different perspectives facilitates a deeper level of reflection on writing practices. In addition, the conversations reveal writer identities and different beliefs about the nature of academic writing across and within disciplines. Finally, we consider the different roles of the facilitators as elicitor, facilitator or instructor. Being aware of these roles allows a more strategic approach to dialogic pedagogy in writing groups.
Writing groups for doctoral education. SHE, 34 8 , Halvorsen, K. Team decision-making in workplace meetings. Journal of Pragmatics, 76, Wilmot, K. Writing groups as transformative spaces. Moving writing courses into digital environments allows systematic access to data pertaining to student production and instructor assessment.
This makes possible — and encourages — new questions and techniques of inquiry of writing patterns, testing of exploratory questions, and teasing out what kind of information such data can be made to yield.
A digital perspective on aesthetics
This study uses corpus methodology to analyse peer feedback and summative instructor feedback. In total, the corpus comprises approximately , words. Given the continuity of course settings, instructions and instructors, we treat the student and instructor body as homogenous and representative of ESL contexts for teaching and learning academic writing at tertiary level.
By looking at features of affective language in peer and instructor feedback, we explore criticism and praise as negotiations of authorial identities, degrees of social presence, and formation of communities of inquiry. For these, we draw from research on affective and cognitive discourse features cf. Mirador  on describing the genre of teacher comments through linguistic expressions. We find that instructor feedback contains fewer instances of affective language than peer feedback, the different features of affective language are distributed differently in peer and instructor feedback, and some, but not all, affective language features in instructor feedback correlate to grades.
Furthermore, analysis of affective language reveals that summative feedback frequently incorporates elements of formative feedback, intentionally or unintentionally. This may be neither time-efficient nor beneficial for student learning, and may reflect uncertainty about the role and function of summative feedback. Our three-year longitudinal study coded and tracked student transfer of writing strategies from first through fourth year at university. Our student informants verified this need as they report becoming mindful about figuring out transfer themselves. Using our findings, this workshop will have four blocks of activities, each minutes long:.
Participants will then brainstorm writing strategies that should transfer from alphabetic texts to disciplinary and multimodal writing.
They will be asked to enter ideas into a shared Google Doc. Groups will briefly point to highlights they generated. Globalization has had a wide range of implications for higher education in general and writing studies pedagogy and research in particular Conference on College Composition and Communication, These implications have been addressed in a recent spate of theoretical and empirical studies on innovative translingual pedagogical practices in writing programs worldwide e. Horner and Tetreault, , transnational writing program administration e.
Martins, , or, to give but one more example, translingual graduate student writing programs e. Brinkschulte et al.
Contributing to this literature and the debate on current and future directions of writing pedagogy at European universities in general e. Contextualizing the work on English and German texts by L1 and L2 undergraduate and graduate writers -- many of them native speakers of German familiar with academic conventions in Germany -- in individual consultations and different teaching formats and in recent theoretical debates on translanguaging e.
The approach taken will be illustrated with several examples from the workshops offered for graduate students. In classes of academic writing, students often ask questions such as "Why do I need a thesis statement? In fact, one of the major reasons why students have problems with academic writing is their lack of awareness about the rationale behind its conventions. Among others, culture plays a major role in shaping conventions of academic writing. While argumentation might surface rarely in the higher education of some cultures, it is a dominant tradition in the Anglo-American world.
In fact, conventions of argumentative writing as students are taught at universities worldwide are deeply anchored in the cultural patterns prevalent in the United Kingdom and North America.
In order to learn writing effective thesis statements and topic sentences, students, in non-British and non-American contexts in particular, need to have a thorough awareness of cultural assumptions behind these conventions. In my presentation, I will demonstrate ways of teaching argumentative writing through these cultural assumptions. I will specifically focus on communicative tendencies such as debating and public speaking dominant in the social and cultural life of the Anglo-American world to highlight the embeddedness of argumentation in cultural practices.
If culture plays a paramount role in the way we communicate academically, an analysis of communicative patterns can be an effective way of overcoming students' writing problems. Kaplan noted in that just because you can write an essay in your L1 does not necessarily mean you can write one in an L2 and with it he founded the theory of contrastive rhetoric, which 50 years on, despite significant research in this area, still lacks a pedagogical framework. I have developed a theoretical conceptual framework which focusses on the epistemological, conceptual, representational, and stylistic aspects of postgraduate writing.
From this I am currently developing a practical framework to provide transitional support for the development of written articulacy across the disciplines. In this session I will first introduce the theoretical framework before discussing how this may be developed into practical support, both online and in the classroom.
The Inside Text by R. Harper (ebook)
This study adopts a simulation triad -- namely a nexus for the course instructor, 3 course TAs, and students to fulfill the role-playing module -- to administer a large-sized writing class for overseas graduate school application. These undergraduates in National Taiwan University have three main targets to apply for admission: the US universities, the European universities, and the Japanese universities. In this case, the students are facing a specific yet imaginary audience in the admissions committee Posselt, Geographically and culturally far away from these groups of audience, students have to figure out and rely on a certain rubric to get their research ideas and study plans effectively across to their readers.
An effective mode of intercultural communication through academic writing is thus urgently needed. The preliminary results show that the subjects in this study i.